A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education

Publikasjonsår : 2015 | Innleggsdato: 2018-11-14
Legg tilFjern
Legg til

Beskrivelse

Studien sammenligner læringsutbytte fra online og blended learning med tradisjonell undervisning av sykepleiestudenter. Studien omfatter både kvalitative og kvantitative effektstudier, og presenterer disse på en systematisk måte. Den viser til at to av de inkluderte studiene viser lovende og positive resultater for bruk at blended learning for undervisning av kliniske ferdigheter i sykepleie, men på grunn av metodiske svakheter trekkes ingen klare resultater. Forfatterne peker på behovet for mer robuste studier.

Forfattere: McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D.
År: 2015
Kilde: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2):255-270
Sammendrag:

AIM: To determine whether the use of an online or blended learning paradigm has the potential to enhance the teaching of clinical skills in undergraduate nursing.

BACKGROUND: The need to adequately support and develop students in clinical skills is now arguably more important than previously considered due to reductions in practice opportunities. Online and blended teaching methods are being developed to try and meet this requirement, but knowledge about their effectiveness in teaching clinical skills is limited.

DESIGN: Mixed methods systematic review, which follows the Joanna Briggs Institute User guide version 5.

DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of five databases were undertaken for the period 1995-August 2013.

REVIEW METHODS: Critical appraisal and data extraction were undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute tools for experimental/observational studies and interpretative and critical research. A narrative synthesis was used to report results.

RESULTS: Nineteen published papers were identified. Seventeen papers reported on online approaches and only two papers reported on a blended approach. The synthesis of findings focused on the following four areas: performance/clinical skill, knowledge, self-efficacy/clinical confidence and user experience/satisfaction. The e-learning interventions used varied throughout all the studies.

CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that online learning for teaching clinical skills is no less effective than traditional means. Highlighted by this review is the lack of available evidence on the implementation of a blended learning approach to teaching clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of this teaching methodology.

Metodisk kvalitetsvurdering:

Reviewen er gjennomført på en svært systematisk måte i tråd med Joanna Briggs Institute guide for denne typen studier og er godt dokumentert. Den er transparent mht konsekvenser av eventuelle følger i de inkluderte studiene.

Utdanning:
Utdanningsnivå: